Definition of cPanel Hosting
For your info, it's good to be aware that most of the cPanel website hosting offers on the current web hosting marketplace are furnished by a very inconsiderable business segment (as far as annual cash flow is concerned) called reseller hosting. Reseller website hosting is a type of a small-size marketing segment, which generates a great number of different web hosting trademarks, yet offering strictly the same thing: mostly cPanel web hosting solutions. This is bad news for everyone. Why? Because of the fact that at least 98 percent of the hosting offers on the whole web hosting market supply absolutely the same service: cPanel. There's no difference at all. Even the cPanel-based website hosting price tags are identical. Very identical. Leaving for those who require a top web hosting service virtually no other website hosting platform/Control Panel alternative. So, there is merely a single fact: out of more than 200,000 website hosting trademarks in the world, the non-cPanel based ones are less than two percent! Less than two percent, remark that one...
200,000 "website hosting vendors", all cPanel-based, yet distinctly dubbed
1 website hosted
30-Day Free Trial
5 websites hosted
30-Day Free Trial
The website hosting "diversity" and the web hosting "offers" Google shows to all of us come down to merely one solution: cPanel. Under hundreds of 1000's of different website hosting brand names. Suppose you are simply a normal fellow who's not very familiar with (as most of us) with the web page creation processes and the web hosting platforms, which in fact power the separate domains and web pages. Are you ready to make your web hosting selection? Is there any web hosting variant you can decide upon? Of course there is, now there are more than 200k website hosting suppliers out there. Formally. Then where is the difficulty? Here's where: more than 98% of these more than two hundred thousand different hosting brands around the world will offer you precisely the same cPanel hosting CP and platform, branded differently, with exactly the same price tags! WOW! That's how immense the diversity on the present hosting market is... Full stop.
The website hosting LOTTO we are all participating in
Simple math demonstrates that to encounter a non-cPanel based web hosting firm is a great strike of luck. There is a less than 1 in fifty chance that something like that will take place! Less than 1 in fifty...
The strong and weak points of the cPanel-based website hosting solution
Let's not be relentless with cPanel. After all, in the years 2001-2004 cPanel was fashionable and probably covered all website hosting market preconditions. In brief, cPanel can achieve the desired result if you have only one single domain to host. But, if you have more domain names...
Weak Point Number 1: A laughable domain folder configuration
If you have 2 or more domain names, however, be extra careful not to delete fully the add-on ones (that's how cPanel will dub each new hosted domain, which is not the default one: an add-on domain name). The files of the add-on domain names are very easy to delete on the server, since they all are situated into the root folder of the default domain, which is the quite popular public_html folder. Each add-on domain is a folder situated inside the folder of the default domain. Like a sub-folder. Next time attempt not to delete the files of the add-on domain names, please. Examine for yourself how fabulous cPanel's domain folder configuration is:public_html (here my-default-domain.com is placed)
public_html/my-family (a folder part of my-default-domain.com)
public_html/my-second-domain.com (an add-on domain name)
public_html/my-second-wife (a folder part of my-default-domain.com)
public_html/my-second-wife.net (an add-on domain name)
public_html/my-third-domain.com (an add-on domain)
public_html/my-third-wife (a folder part of my-default-domain.com)
public_html/my-third-wife.net (an add-on domain)
public_html/rebeka (a folder part of my-default-domain.com)
public_html/rebeka.my-third-wife.net (a sub-domain of an add-on domain name)
Are you growing confused? We unquestionably are!
Negative Side Number Two: The same mail folder system
The e-mail folder arrangement on the server is literally the same as that of the domains... Making the very same error twice?!? The admin chums firmly enhance their faith in God when handling the e-mail folders on the electronic mail server, praying not to mess things up too severely.
Negative Point No.3: A thorough shortage of domain manipulation tools
Do we have to point out the entire deficiency of a modern domain name management tool - a place where you can: register/migrate/renew/park or administer domains, edit domain names' Whois info, secure the Whois details, edit/set up name servers (DNS) and DNS records? cPanel does not offer such a "modern" tool at all. That's a gigantic downside. An unpardonable one, we want to add...
Negative Sign Number 4: Numerous user login places (min two, max three)
How about the need for an additional login to utilize the billing transaction, domain name and technical support management interface? That's aside from the cPanel user account login credentials you've been already provided by the cPanel website hosting provider. Now and then, depending on the invoicing transaction platform (especially created for cPanel exclusively) the cPanel website hosting supplier is utilizing, the eager users can wind up with two additional logins (1: the billing transaction/domain name management GUI; 2: the ticket support section), winding up with a total of three login places (counting cPanel).
Weak Point No.5: More than 120 web hosting CP areas to become acquainted with... rapidly
cPanel offers for your consideration more than a hundred and twenty menus inside the web hosting Control Panel. It's a fantastic idea to become familiar with each of them. And you'd better memorize them rapidly... That's very impertinent on cPanel's side.
With all due appreciation, we have a rhetorical question for all cPanel website hosting corporations:
As far as we are aware of, it's not the year 2001, is it? Remark that one as well...